Valuing Carlos Silva
It has been hard to think about anything but performance-enhancing drugs for the past week, but I’ll take a break to talk about Carlos Sliva’s new deal. Yesterday, the Seattle Mariners signed Silva to a four-year, $48 million deal ($12 million/year, see comments). The size of the contract surprised some, as The Seattle Times described him as “a league-average sinker-ball pitcher who wins about as many games as he loses.”
Silva had a bad year in 2006—the 38 bombs he allowed was a big part of the problem—but he rebounded in 2007. Taking a three-year average of his worth and projecting it out over the course of his contract—adjusting for aging and salary growth—my model projects that he will generate $45 million ($11.25 million/year) over the next four years. This is close to what he got. It’s not that Carlos Silva is a fantastic pitcher, but what he does on the field is still quite valuable. As baseball revenues rise, so do player salaries.
I’m not a big fan of the M’s use of the free agent market—I think they rely on it too much—but at least they are not overspending. Dave Cameron provides an in-depth look at Silva’s skill set, and I think he’s not all that happy with the signing.


J.C. Bradbury is an economist and associate professor at Kennesaw State University in metropolitan Atlanta. He is the author of The Baseball Economist and has operated Sabernomics.com since March 2004.



December 21st, 2007 at 11:29 am
Of course, the total value of the contract was $48 million; the average per-year is $12 million.
December 21st, 2007 at 11:33 am
Thanks AAR. I fixed it.
December 23rd, 2007 at 11:56 pm
I can’t see anything wrong with this. Hes durable and at an age where he should remain effective. He is also a ground ball pitcher moving to a slightly more favorable ballpark. Although the Mariners fielding is slightly worse, I think playing on real grass will be beneficial to him.