<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Relevance of Kenerly&#8217;s Ownership Stake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2008/09/the-relevance-of-kenerlys-ownership-stake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2008/09/the-relevance-of-kenerlys-ownership-stake/</link>
	<description>Economic Thinking about Baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:16:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry in Gwinnett</title>
		<link>http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2008/09/the-relevance-of-kenerlys-ownership-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-104556</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry in Gwinnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/?p=972#comment-104556</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad you picked up on this and are not letting it go.  Obviously, the AJC does not &quot;get it&quot;.  If Kenerly owned even a 1% interest in this property, he should have recused himself from voting on the stadium deal.  It&#039;s obvious to me why this is unethical and a conflict of interest.  Wonder why the AJC can&#039;t grasp this?

I&#039;m with you in hoping that someone will follow through on this and hold Kenerly accountable.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad you picked up on this and are not letting it go.  Obviously, the AJC does not &#8220;get it&#8221;.  If Kenerly owned even a 1% interest in this property, he should have recused himself from voting on the stadium deal.  It&#8217;s obvious to me why this is unethical and a conflict of interest.  Wonder why the AJC can&#8217;t grasp this?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you in hoping that someone will follow through on this and hold Kenerly accountable.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

